Acer Predator PHN16-71

Performance Results

Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop 114%
Workstation 102%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics68.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive471% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PHN16-71  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL Compass_RTX
Memory4.3 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240325
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '24 at 21:23
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 73.3
1-Core 215
2-Core 418
120% 235 Pts
4-Core 807
8-Core 1,528
139% 1,167 Pts
64-Core 3,328
206% 3,328 Pts
Poor: 108%
This bench: 112%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060 (Laptop)
Acer(1025 170F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 556.12
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.6% Good
Lighting 90.6
Reflection 80.8
Parallax 74.5
74% 82 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 61.2
Splatting 47.8
58% 75.5 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 129%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFS001TEJ9X125N 1TB
719GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51022A20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2427 1385 1372 1393 1417 1422 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
471% Outstanding
Read 4,702
Write 4,187
Mixed 2771
SusWrite 1,569
738% 3,307 MB/s
4K Read 75.4
4K Write 268
4K Mixed 107
393% 150 MB/s
DQ Read 1,686
DQ Write 1,288
DQ Mixed 1,453
1,096% 1,476 MB/s
Poor: 325%
This bench: 471%
Great: 583%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78AGBSA095N 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
82.6% Excellent
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 29.5
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 22.1
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 165 16" 1280 720 BOE0A2C
Typical Predator PHN16-71 Builds (Compare 1,418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 108%
Desktop 111%
Workstation 121%

System: Acer Predator PHN16-71

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback