Cyberpowerpc GamingPC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 173%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 202%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics148% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive410% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemCyberpowerpc GamingPC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME B760M-A AX
Memory1.5 GB free of 16 GB
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240221
Uptime14 Days
Run DateJul 10 '24 at 21:23
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700F-$310
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 80.9
1-Core 208
2-Core 416
121% 235 Pts
4-Core 826
8-Core 1481
139% 1,154 Pts
64-Core 2,877
178% 2,877 Pts
Poor: 116%
This bench: 118%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$390
Zotac(19DA 7717) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 546.65
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
148% Outstanding
Lighting 205
Reflection 190
Parallax 233
167% 210 fps
MRender 281
Gravity 162
Splatting 122
146% 188 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 148%
Great: 157%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN580 1TB
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 281010WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3668 2550 724 297 356 391 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
410% Outstanding
Read 3,688
Write 3,611
Mixed 2,615
SusWrite 1331
629% 2,811 MB/s
4K Read 73.7
4K Write 228
4K Mixed 93.5
352% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 1,824
DQ Write 1,503
DQ Mixed 1,670
1,249% 1,665 MB/s
Poor: 243%
This bench: 410%
Great: 594%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc UD5-6000 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 32.4
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 24.6
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 6: 0P 0R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
6% 11% 36 217 59 100 35" 1280 720 SPT8928 Sceptre O35
Typical GamingPC Builds (Compare 290 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 188%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 127%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 247%
UFO

System: Cyberpowerpc GamingPC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $880
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback