Gigabyte GA-P85-D3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop 62%
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P85-D3  (all builds)
Memory20.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '24 at 16:10
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 186
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 347
47% 350 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
MSI(1462 2309) 1GB
CLim: 730 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.98% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 1.3
3% 3.03 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 3.4
3% 4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.98%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 32 24 28 28 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 15.9
Write 40.1
Mixed 24
SusWrite 27.7
20% 26.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
23% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 52%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
136GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 91 90 91 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 91.2
Write 90.3
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 90.1
60% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.1% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 17.5
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 18.3
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 38 60 21.5" 1920 1080 SAM0523 SyncMaster
Typical GA-P85-D3 Builds (Compare 389 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop 71%
Workstation 27%

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P85-D3 - $91

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $375
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback