Performance Results

Gaming 50%
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemECT A_M_I  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte B85M-D3H
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '24 at 16:10
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 82
1-Core 109
2-Core 233
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 621
64% 519 Pts
64-Core 616
38% 616 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Nvidia(10DE 2182) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.6% Good
Lighting 81
Reflection 85.4
Parallax 73.7
66% 80 fps
MRender 21.3
Gravity 82.7
Splatting 71.9
50% 58.6 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 81%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
431GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 410 444 443 446 451 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 437
Write 438
Mixed 353
SusWrite 404
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 38.5
124% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 325
243% 323 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BA160B.C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 16.3
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 15.5
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 12 513 457 60 84.6" 2560 1377 SAM723F SAMSUNG
Typical A_M_I Builds (Compare 154 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: ECT A_M_I

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $642
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback