Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics84.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory41.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime7.6 Days
Run DateJul 10 '24 at 16:10
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 71%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Memory 84.5
1-Core 143
2-Core 305
95% 177 Pts
4-Core 582
8-Core 922
92% 752 Pts
64-Core 1,439
89% 1,439 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 883A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 556.12
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.7% Excellent
Lighting 122
Reflection 87
Parallax 89.5
99% 99.3 fps
MRender 78.1
Gravity 80.3
Splatting 55.8
57% 71.4 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,683
Write 2,901
Mixed 1,972
631% 2,852 MB/s
4K Read 60
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 68.4
254% 90 MB/s
DQ Read 1,313
DQ Write 835
DQ Mixed 1,086
806% 1,078 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 507%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
476GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 167 170 174 178 181 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 74.9
Write 94.1
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 172
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
49% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 106%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 1TB
737GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 34 34 35 36 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 50.1
Write 36
Mixed 24.4
SusWrite 34.5
46% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
48% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 54%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
637GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 120 121 130 118 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 87.4
Write 91.1
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 120
115% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.6
205% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2Z3600C18 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 44.1
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 39.9
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 28.9
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 37.2
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 72.6
55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 102%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 36: 0P 2R 6G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
36% 20% 79 197 57 120 27" 1280 720 LHC904E A27G6G23
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,789 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PRO (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $810
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback