Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 163%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 172%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics197% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
9 days ago, 9 days ago.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 10 '24 at 16:09
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$177
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 70.3
1-Core 144
2-Core 285
88% 166 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 1,068
97% 812 Pts
64-Core 1,453
90% 1,453 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7800-XT
ASRock(1849 5327) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 24.6.1
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
197% Outstanding
Lighting 258
Reflection 272
Parallax 512
210% 347 fps
MRender 315
Gravity 281
Splatting 286
240% 294 fps
Poor: 130%
This bench: 197%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,467
Write 2,362
Mixed 1,681
483% 2,170 MB/s
4K Read 62.5
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 88
290% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,262
DQ Write 983
DQ Mixed 1,102
830% 1,116 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$69
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 143 143 136 145 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 96.4
Write 121
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 142
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
72% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
664GB free
Firmware: HP64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 100 94 102 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 85.6
Write 46.5
Mixed 50.6
SusWrite 99.6
52% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 3200 C16 Series DDR4 3200 3200 C16 Series 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.7% Good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 26
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 27.2
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 99.7
40% 99.7 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 165 31.5" 1280 720 ACR0000 ED320QR S
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,903 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $1,164
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback