Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 198%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 197%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics219% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive287% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '24 at 16:09
Run Duration297 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$154
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Memory 81.9
1-Core 140
2-Core 272
90% 165 Pts
4-Core 545
8-Core 916
89% 731 Pts
64-Core 1,398
86% 1,398 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-S (Super)-$455
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 556.12
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
219% Outstanding
Lighting 310
Reflection 309
Parallax 359
252% 326 fps
MRender 446
Gravity 266
Splatting 214
241% 309 fps
Poor: 186%
This bench: 219%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$147
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1542 1278 1232 1178 1163 865 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
287% Outstanding
Read 2,401
Write 2,370
Mixed 1,649
SusWrite 1,210
428% 1,907 MB/s
4K Read 55.8
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 76.8
254% 88.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,015
DQ Write 700
DQ Mixed 882
652% 866 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 287%
Great: 372%
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 4TB-$285
3.5TB free
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2768 3544 3527 3570 3563 3558 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
459% Outstanding
Read 2,789
Write 3,669
Mixed 3029
SusWrite 3,422
731% 3,227 MB/s
4K Read 71.1
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 96.6
310% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,063
DQ Write 823
DQ Mixed 940
704% 942 MB/s
Poor: 306%
This bench: 459%
Great: 619%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
139GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 427 443 444 402 359 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 438
Mixed 415
SusWrite 415
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 55
173% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 108%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$220
549GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 427 443 444 402 444 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 439
Mixed 426
SusWrite 429
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 55.4
174% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 110%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C16D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
101% Outstanding
MC Read 41.5
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 41.1
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 28.6
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 40.9
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 101%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 43: 0P 5R 6G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
22% 18% 34 216 59 165 31.5" 1536 928 IVM761C PL3271Q
History: Score 22: 0P 2R 4G 0B | Score 45: 0P 4R 8G 1B | Score 43: 0P 5R 6G 0B
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,903 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,141
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback