Asus H110M-PLUS

Performance Results

Gaming 63%
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 55%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics75.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive50.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H110M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180329
Uptime20 Days
Run DateJul 10 '24 at 16:08
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User BIH-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$139
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 88.6
1-Core 117
2-Core 204
79% 136 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 622
62% 505 Pts
64-Core 648
40% 648 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.6% Very good
Lighting 93.3
Reflection 155
Parallax 96
76% 115 fps
MRender 93.8
Gravity 92.6
Splatting 88.3
75% 91.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDRE250GB 250GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1007C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 179 152 153 128 128 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 475
Write 303
Mixed 281
SusWrite 164
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 21
68% 17.4 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 91%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$23
779GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 175 181 178 178 175 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 164
Mixed 38.4
SusWrite 177
103% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 105%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8213.M8FB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
69.7% Good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 20.1
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 21
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 23.8" 1920 1017 DELA1C5 DELL P2422H
Typical H110M-PLUS Builds (Compare 643 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 47%
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback