Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 290%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 122%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 308%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 124%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics241% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive509% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '24 at 14:50
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X-$280
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 211
2-Core 420
126% 241 Pts
4-Core 841
8-Core 1637
147% 1,239 Pts
64-Core 2,039
126% 2,039 Pts
Poor: 99%
This bench: 124%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XT-$900
XFX(1EAE 7905) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 20GB, Driver: 24.6.1
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
241% Outstanding
Lighting 314
Reflection 452
Parallax 625
256% 464 fps
MRender 467
Gravity 224
Splatting 441
313% 377 fps
Poor: 158%
This bench: 241%
Great: 249%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial T705 M.2 1TB-$166
805GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PACR5111
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5530 1433 1188 1173 1182 1178 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
509% Outstanding
Read 6,223
Write 6,257
Mixed 3,600
SusWrite 1,947
1,007% 4,507 MB/s
4K Read 61.8
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 80.5
265% 90.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,780
DQ Write 874
DQ Mixed 1,560
1,096% 1,405 MB/s
Poor: 400%
This bench: 509%
Great: 731%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR5 5600 C36 2x16GB-$114
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
182% Outstanding
MC Read 58.5
MC Write 72
MC Mixed 67.4
188% 66 GB/s
SC Read 57.3
SC Write 65.9
SC Mixed 61.7
176% 61.6 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 119%
This bench: 182%
Great: 189%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 165 31.5" 1280 720 GSM7766 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 378 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 414%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 421%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X670 AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $2,374
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $224Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $350WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $92
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback