Gigabyte GA-B650 GAMING X AX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B650 GAMING X AX  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230606
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateJul 10 '24 at 14:25
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600-$193
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 77.1
1-Core 192
2-Core 375
112% 215 Pts
4-Core 678
8-Core 1,090
108% 884 Pts
64-Core 1,392
86% 1,392 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 102%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7600
Sapphire(1DA2 E448) ≥ 4GB
Driver: amdxn64.dll Ver. 31.0.24033.1003
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
126% Outstanding
Lighting 145
Reflection 182
Parallax 262
118% 197 fps
MRender 227
Gravity 168
Splatting 199
162% 198 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 126%
Great: 131%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
128GB free
Firmware: P9CR30A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,079
Write 2,676
Mixed 2150
517% 2,302 MB/s
4K Read 58
4K Write 268
4K Mixed 92.9
349% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 1,848
DQ Write 1,485
DQ Mixed 1655
1,242% 1,663 MB/s
Poor: 102% Great: 394%
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0406B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 22 21 27 27 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 5% Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560C40-8 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
120% Outstanding
MC Read 48.8
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 40.8
121% 42.2 GB/s
SC Read 46.9
SC Write 42.2
SC Mixed 43.6
126% 44.2 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 114%
This bench: 120%
Great: 173%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 54 75 23.8" 1280 720 ACR06BF VG240Y
Typical GA-B650 GAMING X AX Builds (Compare 391 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 217%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 221%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B650 GAMING X AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $1,143
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback