Performance Results

Gaming 166%
Desktop 103%
Workstation 165%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics177% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive654% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory53.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2880 x 1620 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240329
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 10 '24 at 14:24
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$329
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Memory 82.7
1-Core 165
2-Core 317
101% 188 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 951
92% 759 Pts
64-Core 1,433
89% 1,433 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4850 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 556.12
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
177% Outstanding
Lighting 256
Reflection 238
Parallax 262
209% 252 fps
MRender 288
Gravity 210
Splatting 152
170% 217 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 177%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MSI M480 2TB
968GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFM31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 4.7 13 20 23 5.1 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
654% Outstanding
Read 8,779
Write 67.5
Mixed 130
SusWrite 13.5
467% 2,248 MB/s
4K Read 746
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 8.1
1,142% 253 MB/s
Poor: 240%
This bench: 654%
Great: 578%
Patriot Ignite 480GB-$148
353GB free
Firmware: SAFM01.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 4.6 13 20 23 60 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 61% Great: 113%
Intenso SSD 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: W0802A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 4.7 13 20 23 4.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 272%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
930GB free
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 37 97 148 166 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 1,399
Write 1,208
Mixed 949
SusWrite 103
204% 915 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 62.8
206% 70.5 MB/s
DQ Read 681
DQ Write 874
DQ Mixed 270
345% 608 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 161%
Great: 295%
WD Re 3TB (2012)-$65
3TB free
Firmware: 01.01K03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 52 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 96%
WD Blue 2.5" 640GB (2009)-$152
341GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 1 1.6 0.9 0.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3600 C18 Series 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 55.8
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 42.5
119% 41.6 GB/s
SC Read 29.4
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 38.4
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 113%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 165 27.6" 1280 720 ACR0804 ED270R P
Typical MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 184%
Desktop 104%
Workstation 201%

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 UNIFY (MS-7C35) - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $1,061
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback