Samsung 900X3B/900X4B

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Samsung 900X3B/900X4B (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG 900X3B/900X4B
Memory	1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120202
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '18 at 14:21
Run Duration	311 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2467M 4,235 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	52.8% Above average	Memory 82.9 1-Core 60.4 2-Core 97.8 52% 80.4 Pts	4-Core 135 8-Core 135 18% 135 Pts	64-Core 136 8% 136 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sanyo(144D C0CD) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.78% Terrible	Lighting 1.97 Reflection 2.88 Parallax 1.41 2% 2.09 fps	MRender 2.71 Gravity 1.17 Splatting 3.57 2% 2.48 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.78% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk U100 128GB 2,261 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS.11.04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2401 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 899 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 36 (AE) Unknown 100 100 278 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 120 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 200 (F1) Unknown 100 100 2630396036 (F2) Unknown 100 100 3555395507	42.3% Average	Read 442 Write 266 Mixed 246 70% 318 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 8.65 4K Mixed 4.49 26% 7.84 MB/s	DQ Read 27.2 DQ Write 9.02 DQ Mixed 5.42 7% 13.9 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 55%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB 5,095 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 861GB free, PID 61b5 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	14.8% Very poor	Read 26.5 Write 23.6 Mixed 24.7 32% 25 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.85 4K Mixed 0.33 76% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 52%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 134GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 124GB free, PID 0727 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.88% Terrible	Read 12.4 Write 6.02 Mixed 5.21 9% 7.86 MB/s	4K Read 3.27 4K Write 0.003 4K Mixed 0.002 12% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.88% Great: 25%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5174BM0-CH9 2x2GB 119 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	43.1% Average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 15.1 MC Mixed 13.9 42% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 12.8 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 75.4 53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 900X3B/900X4B Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 900X3B/900X4B

CPU
Core i5-2467MIntelBench 45%, 4,235 samples	10x
Core i7-2637MIntelBench 51%, 599 samples	1x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	11x

SSD
MZMPC128HBFU-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 56%, 1,498 samples	5x
MZMPC128HBFU-000KN 128GBBench 53%, 68 samples	1x
MZMPC256HBGJ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 57%, 517 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5174BM0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 42%, 119 samples	10x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16