Asus PRIME X670E-PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 172%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 173%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics147% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive424% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X670E-PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '24 at 16:42
Run Duration304 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$360
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 97.9
1-Core 194
2-Core 385
120% 225 Pts
4-Core 738
8-Core 1,286
122% 1,012 Pts
64-Core 1,780
110% 1,780 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 118%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
MSI(1462 3903) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 556.12
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
147% Outstanding
Lighting 216
Reflection 199
Parallax 192
176% 203 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 146
Splatting 129
123% 154 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 147%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial T705 M.2 1TB-$166
708GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PACR5111
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4195 2989 1142 1170 1127 1125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
424% Outstanding
Read 5,170
Write 4,920
Mixed 3,344
SusWrite 1,958
860% 3,848 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 62.8
205% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 932
DQ Write 572
DQ Mixed 812
589% 772 MB/s
Poor: 400%
This bench: 424%
Great: 731%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
3GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 495
Write 463
Mixed 383
100% 447 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 45.6
145% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 372
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
100GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 946 807 688 654 701 541 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 2,243
Write 1,231
Mixed 841
SusWrite 723
278% 1,259 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 48
154% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,012
DQ Write 770
DQ Mixed 855
649% 879 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 222%
Great: 353%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
276GB free
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1433 1434 1435 1433 1433 1431 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 1,931
Write 1,430
Mixed 908
SusWrite 1,433
319% 1,426 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 47.2
158% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 972
DQ Write 410
DQ Mixed 464
403% 615 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 244%
Great: 283%
WD Se 2TB (2013)-$40
20GB free
Firmware: 01.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 84 82 83 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 79.2
Write 85.9
Mixed 70
SusWrite 82.7
59% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TZ/RJ/FX DDR5 6400 C36 2x16GB-$105
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
199% Outstanding
MC Read 77.8
MC Write 66.8
MC Mixed 73.2
207% 72.6 GB/s
SC Read 62.5
SC Write 56
SC Mixed 64.1
174% 60.9 GB/s
Latency 44.3
90% 44.3 ns
Poor: 136%
This bench: 199%
Great: 201%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 165 31.5" 1280 720 GSM5BD3 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical PRIME X670E-PRO WIFI Builds (Compare 131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 414%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 421%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X670E-PRO WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $2,267
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $224Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $350WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $92
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback