Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics36.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 8  (all builds)
Memory29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '18 at 23:23
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Memory 97.3
97% 97.3 Pts
Poor: 71% Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
EVGA(3842 3687) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1303 MHz, MLim: 1530 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Lighting 44.3
Reflection 40.2
Parallax 53.3
36% 45.9 fps
MRender 51.8
Gravity 50.3
Splatting 38
37% 46.7 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210
103GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 525
Write 497
Mixed 512
114% 512 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 48.2
174% 68.4 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 169
175% 286 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 121%
Great: 124%
SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$160
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R211 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 487
Write 127
Mixed 188
58% 267 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 13.6
119% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 27.5
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 40.6
40% 60.8 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 81%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
842GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 115
Write 123
Mixed 109
87% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 2.12
4K Mixed 0.16
92% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3866 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3808 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 42.4
MC Write 48.4
MC Mixed 36.7
121% 42.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 54
SC Mixed 35.2
108% 38 GB/s
Latency 49.2
81% 49.2 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 120%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Gaming 8 Builds (Compare 168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $771
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback