bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DX58SO
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '18 at 22:10
Run Duration531 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
J1PR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 72.4
2-Core 134
62% 99.4 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 355
39% 307 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Lighting 24.6
Reflection 19.1
Parallax 22.5
20% 22 fps
MRender 27
Gravity 25.2
Splatting 19
19% 23.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.7% Below average
Read 212
Write 121
Mixed 121
33% 152 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 24
4K Mixed 9.18
60% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 22
DQ Write 42.2
DQ Mixed 8.43
13% 24.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 91%
Kingston HyperX Predator AHCI PCIe M.2 240GB-$141
184GB free
Firmware: 0C4005T2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 796
Write 779
Mixed 765
174% 780 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 14.6
73% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 24.5
DQ Write 59.4
DQ Mixed 17.1
20% 33.7 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 103%
Great: 159%
ASMT 2115 250GB
233GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 26.6
Write 24.9
Mixed 4.05
21% 18.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.85
4K Mixed 0.27
39% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12%
Great: 209%
Verbatim 32GB
29GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
6.14% Terrible
Read 24.7
Write 6.72
Mixed 8.74
14% 13.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.57
4K Write 0.006
4K Mixed 0.007
17% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.14%
Great: 13%
USB 2.0 Flash Drive 2GB
2GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
4.48% Terrible
Read 18.1
Write 4.16
Mixed 6
9% 9.41 MB/s
4K Read 3.92
4K Write 0.009
4K Mixed 0.006
15% 1.31 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.48%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.6% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 10.1
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 63.8
63% 63.8 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,249 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback