Asus P8Z68-V LE

Performance Results

Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop 73%
Workstation 29%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 days ago, 22 days ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V LE  (all builds)
Memory17.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130909
Uptime8.8 Days
Run DateJun 21 '24 at 18:51
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 38%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 83.7
2-Core 168
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 269
37% 274 Pts
64-Core 302
19% 302 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.4% Above average
Lighting 64.4
Reflection 67.5
Parallax 62.3
52% 64.7 fps
MRender 65.4
Gravity 65.1
Splatting 61.5
52% 64 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 109 51 39 39 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 417
Write 206
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 76
41% 189 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 8.4
36% 10.5 MB/s
DQ Read 32.9
DQ Write 13.9
DQ Mixed 8.3
10% 18.4 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 56%
Sandisk S128G 126GB
117GB free
Firmware: 3.2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 309 342 345 348 332 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 420
Write 307
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 327
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 17
4K Mixed 11.8
46% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 32.5
DQ Write 19.1
DQ Mixed 19.3
16% 23.6 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 56%
Sandisk S3 500G 500GB
157GB free
Firmware: 415020RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 213 221 213 214 212 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.5% Good
Read 248
Write 236
Mixed 177
SusWrite 212
49% 218 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 30.8
97% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 197
149% 201 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL Kingston KHX1600C9D3/8GX 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL Kingston KHX1600C9D3/8GX 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
55.6% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 18
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 16.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 24 3 144 27" 2498 1417 HKC2711 27E1QA
Typical P8Z68-V LE Builds (Compare 605 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop 75%
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $463
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback