Asrock H310CM-IB

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H310CM-IB  (all builds)
Memory16.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 19 '24 at 18:30
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 84.1
1-Core 118
2-Core 237
82% 147 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 647
70% 554 Pts
64-Core 648
40% 648 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 163
Reflection 113
Parallax 152
133% 143 fps
MRender 202
Gravity 130
Splatting 105
114% 146 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 121%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$53
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 444
Write 356
Mixed 315
82% 372 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 17.7
70% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 82.9
DQ Mixed 43.9
48% 80.6 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$22
114GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 94 93 93 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 168
Write 116
Mixed 86.9
SusWrite 93.4
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF424C18BB/16-SP 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 24GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 19.6
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 19.4
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 14: 0P 0R 4G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
14% 40% 15 212 57 60 24" 1280 720 ACI24A4 VG248
Typical H310CM-IB Builds (Compare 987 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-IB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $272
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback