Asus H110M-A/M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-A/M.2  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161227
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJun 19 '24 at 18:29
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 75.1
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 186
67% 117 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 353
46% 349 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4974
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
3.85% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 4
Parallax 5.7
4% 5.07 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 0.3
3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.85%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 256GB SSD 256GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 76 65 37 63 37 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 620
Write 287
Mixed 321
SusWrite 56.9
71% 321 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 91.9
4K Mixed 27.1
113% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 89.5
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 122
110% 162 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 240%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 7.9
26% 9.27 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 8.1
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 19.4" 1280 720 DELD096 DELL P2017H
Typical H110M-A/M.2 Builds (Compare 3,191 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-A/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback