287804u-bm12123 B450M-DRAGON

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics86.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Motherboard287804u-bm12123 B450M-DRAGON  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 19 '24 at 18:26
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4500
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 70.6
1-Core 136
2-Core 250
83% 152 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 827
80% 656 Pts
64-Core 1,069
66% 1,069 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$227
Asus(1043 86F0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.22
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.7% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 98.9
Parallax 103
89% 104 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 96.5
Splatting 86.4
82% 103 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso PCIe 240GB
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM20.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 560 283 282 406 274 251 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
69% Good
Read 291
Write 202
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 343
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 9.1
55% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 435
DQ Write 492
DQ Mixed 712
468% 547 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 69%
Great: 208%
Netac 120GB 120GB
0GB free
Firmware: V0414A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 448
Write 397
Mixed 360
89% 402 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 24.4
115% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 0.7
37% 88.3 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
369GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 161 165 162 162 163 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 144
Write 152
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 163
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 88%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.9% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 26.1
76% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 20.4
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 97.7
41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 23" 1920 1080 PHLC0C7 PHL 234E5
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback