Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7

Performance Results

Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop 79%
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58A-UD7  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100824
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 18 '24 at 12:27
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 X 980-$148
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 93.7
1-Core 86.5
2-Core 173
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 402
46% 360 Pts
64-Core 503
31% 503 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Gainward(10B0 13C0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 555.85
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.9% Above average
Lighting 70.3
Reflection 81.3
Parallax 72.7
57% 74.8 fps
MRender 75.3
Gravity 69.9
Splatting 63.4
56% 69.5 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 66%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 250GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 43 24 19 19 18 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.3% Above average
Read 268
Write 233
Mixed 207
SusWrite 39.5
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 34.2
113% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 137
109% 149 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 265%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
48.1% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 11.8
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 57.2
70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 24 60 21.5" 1280 720 SAM0524 SyncMaster
Typical GA-X58A-UD7 Builds (Compare 423 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop 73%
Workstation 28%

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $394
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $198Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $77
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback