Intel H55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel H55  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230131
Uptime12 Days
Run DateJun 17 '24 at 18:37
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 68.7
2-Core 145
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 333
36% 286 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
AMD(1002 2B0A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.7% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 9.1
6% 8.53 fps
MRender 9.5
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 6.7
6% 7.67 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.7%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 256GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0714A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 135 131 131 128 130 MB/s
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.1% Above average
Read 248
Write 225
Mixed 230
SusWrite 146
48% 212 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 20.9
84% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 44.1
75% 146 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 166%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
40.8% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 13.1
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 12.1
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 0" 1280 720 Default
Typical H55 Builds (Compare 2,114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $77
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback