Asus ASUS Vivobook S 16 M5606UA_M5606UA

Performance Results

Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 47%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive233% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
27 days ago, 27 days ago.
SystemAsus ASUS Vivobook S 16 M5606UA_M5606UA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M5606UA
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240424
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 17 '24 at 18:32
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 60.1
1-Core 178
2-Core 312
96% 183 Pts
4-Core 523
8-Core 943
88% 733 Pts
64-Core 1,484
92% 1,484 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 79%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M Graphics
Asus(1043 36F8) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.20.52
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.1% Average
Lighting 51.3
Reflection 24.1
Parallax 78.4
42% 51.3 fps
MRender 27.3
Gravity 62.4
Splatting 86.5
51% 58.7 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 53%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
887GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1611 1220 1859 1968 2030 2069 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 1,411
Write 1,933
Mixed 1,293
SusWrite 1,793
364% 1,608 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 84.2
4K Mixed 31.2
147% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 704
DQ Write 370
DQ Mixed 762
506% 612 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 233%
Great: 323%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F2G32D4DS-026 WT 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB 23h clocked @ 7500 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
151% Outstanding
MC Read 48.8
MC Write 70.5
MC Mixed 48
159% 55.8 GB/s
SC Read 39.8
SC Write 60.2
SC Mixed 45.9
139% 48.6 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 151%
Great: 153%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 7: 0P 0R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
7% 15% 20 208 56 60 26.9" 1280 720 MSI3CA8 MSI MAG274QRF
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback