Monster ABRA A5 V17.2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics74.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
4 months ago, 27 days ago.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V17.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V17.2
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211206
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 17 '24 at 17:17
Run Duration81 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 72.6
1-Core 156
2-Core 297
93% 175 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 800
81% 658 Pts
64-Core 937
58% 937 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 5015) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 555.99
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Lighting 102
Reflection 118
Parallax 87.6
83% 103 fps
MRender 76.5
Gravity 70.1
Splatting 63.6
57% 70.1 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7401Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,550
Write 1,754
Mixed 1,530
361% 1,611 MB/s
4K Read 56.2
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 81.7
281% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,318
DQ Write 1,074
DQ Mixed 1,150
873% 1,180 MB/s
Poor: 104% Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 32
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 40.7
SC Mixed 18.4
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 97.6
41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 240 24.5" 1920 1009 SAM7279 Odyssey G40B
Typical ABRA A5 V17.2 Builds (Compare 979 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop 76%
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V17.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $55
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback