MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory51 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231013
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateJun 17 '24 at 16:55
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$154
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 94.1
2-Core 179
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 621
59% 486 Pts
64-Core 863
53% 863 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 167
Parallax 187
140% 175 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 146
Splatting 121
120% 150 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 127%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 1TB
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 801 610 583 606 593 582 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 151 151 141 164 173 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 66.8
Write 88.2
Mixed 16
SusWrite 156
59% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
86% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW64GX4M2D3600C18 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 33.8
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 29.7
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 45 9 144 31.5" 2560 1369 SAM0F55 C32JG5x
Typical MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,835 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,012
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback