Asus ZenBook UX393EA_UX393EA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus ZenBook UX393EA_UX393EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX393EA
Memory1 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display3300x2200x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220801
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateJun 17 '24 at 16:54
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
61.5% Good
Memory 60.7
1-Core 155
2-Core 276
87% 164 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 454
51% 398 Pts
64-Core 445
28% 445 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 13E2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Lighting 24.2
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 28.3
20% 26.6 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 0.2
1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNW512G8 512GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 293 55 78 82 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 1,383
Write 903
Mixed 29.6
SusWrite 95.5
131% 603 MB/s
4K Read 58.6
4K Write 15.7
4K Mixed 18.6
121% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 14
DQ Mixed 30.2
58% 126 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 104%
Great: 200%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 53E1G32D2NP-046 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 43.3
MC Mixed 33
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 42.6
SC Mixed 14.9
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 13.9" 1280 720 AUO1A94
Typical ZenBook UX393EA_UX393EA Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Asus ZenBook UX393EA_UX393EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback