Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504VA_X1504VA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive85.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504VA_X1504VA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1504VA
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230601
Uptime16.4 Days
Run DateJun 17 '24 at 16:54
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1335U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
42.2% Average
Memory 31.7
1-Core 86.1
2-Core 164
49% 93.8 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 502
47% 391 Pts
64-Core 686
42% 686 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 287D) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Lighting 16.5
Reflection 18.7
Parallax 18.2
13% 17.8 fps
MRender 14.7
Gravity 23.1
Splatting 14
14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
393GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA003 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 682 106 161 127 70 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 804
Write 660
Mixed 643
SusWrite 204
129% 578 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 36.4
4K Mixed 8.7
79% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 590
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 390
296% 409 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 234%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
39.5% Below average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 13
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 11.9
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 237
17% 237 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 2 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15F5
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504VA_X1504VA Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1504VA_X1504VA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback