Performance Results

Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C52
MotherboardMSI B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '24 at 16:17
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 3000G-$52
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 64.1
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 168
62% 110 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 252
34% 255 Pts
64-Core 255
16% 255 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Nvidia(10DE 105F) 2GB
CLim: 1319 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 20.4
Reflection 18
Parallax 20.5
17% 19.6 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 22.5
Splatting 16.6
17% 21.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 120GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 60 68 70 68 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 414
Write 64
Mixed 111
SusWrite 66.9
35% 164 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 17.6
84% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 32.3
60% 115 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 91%
Kingston SNV2S250G 250GB
170GB free
Firmware: SBJ01101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 802 798 910 940 564 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1,334
Write 992
Mixed 1,006
SusWrite 684
225% 1,004 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 46.7
182% 65.6 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 463
DQ Mixed 425
320% 425 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 169%
Great: 274%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
45.5% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 14.8
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 15.3
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 23.8" 1280 720 BNQ78E7 BenQ GW2480
Typical B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52) Builds (Compare 5,270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 78%
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 73%

Motherboard: MSI B450M-A PRO MAX (MS-7C52)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $372
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $198Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $77
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback