MSI H370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B22)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics93.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B22
MotherboardMSI H370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B22)  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180224
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 16 '24 at 13:12
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600K-$125
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 88.9
1-Core 126
2-Core 251
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 670
74% 583 Pts
64-Core 710
44% 710 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-12GB
Gigabyte(1458 4099) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 555.99
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.9% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 104
Parallax 117
97% 114 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 112
Splatting 93.4
88% 109 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 313 312 311 308 304 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 314
Mixed 268
SusWrite 310
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 33.2
127% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 244
209% 307 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 92%
Great: 129%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
266GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 453 453 462 463 449 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 450
Mixed 434
SusWrite 454
103% 457 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 81
4K Mixed 52.1
170% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 345
261% 350 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 116%
Great: 137%
Sandisk PLUS 480 480GB
249GB free
Firmware: UG40
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 212 225 227 216 224 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 431
Write 382
Mixed 307
SusWrite 236
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 22
4K Mixed 13.1
52% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 66.5
DQ Write 79.6
DQ Mixed 25.6
32% 57.2 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 52%
ST4000DX005-3GH101 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: FC02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 258 257 257 261 255 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 203
Write 256
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 257
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 18.3
4K Mixed 0.2
41% 13.1 MB/s
DQ Read 4.1
DQ Write 17.9
DQ Mixed 1.7
4% 7.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 45%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 193 190 193 195 193 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 140
Mixed 80.6
SusWrite 192
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 111%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.3% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 22.2
74% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 22.5
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 13 72 27" 1920 1017 SAM0D45 C27F398
Typical H370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B22) Builds (Compare 567 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI H370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B22) - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $613
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $259WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback