Performance Results

Gaming 53%
Desktop 74%
Workstation 53%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics73% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive71.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A32
MotherboardMSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32)  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170920
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '24 at 13:06
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$149
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 68.7
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 198
68% 122 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 738
68% 567 Pts
64-Core 1043
65% 1043 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Asus(1043 872A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 555.99
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73% Very good
Lighting 91
Reflection 89.8
Parallax 81.6
74% 87.5 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 82.2
Splatting 73.4
71% 88.9 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2306RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 132 133 119 105 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 481
Write 244
Mixed 206
SusWrite 127
58% 265 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 58.4
4K Mixed 29.3
110% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 123
122% 200 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 91%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB
129GB free
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 298 300 300 300 301 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 477
Mixed 426
SusWrite 318
96% 427 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 50.1
166% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 362
273% 366 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 107%
Great: 122%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$45
1TB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 140 144 161 164 166 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 156
Write 114
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 156
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2Z2666C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2Z2666C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.8% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 11.3
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 14
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 165 27" 1280 720 MSI5CA9 MSI G27C6
Typical X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) Builds (Compare 1,841 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 76%
Desktop 77%
Workstation 75%

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A32) - $155

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $673
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback