MSI X670E GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E16)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics167% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E16
MotherboardMSI X670E GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E16)  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '24 at 12:08
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$569
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 72.4
1-Core 217
2-Core 425
121% 238 Pts
4-Core 823
8-Core 1,587
143% 1,205 Pts
64-Core 3,625
224% 3,625 Pts
Poor: 114%
This bench: 113%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$500
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 555.99
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
167% Outstanding
Lighting 249
Reflection 225
Parallax 220
203% 232 fps
MRender 260
Gravity 166
Splatting 135
147% 187 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 167%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$165
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,841
Write 3,596
Mixed 3021
708% 3,152 MB/s
4K Read 56.2
4K Write 92.2
4K Mixed 68.6
222% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,567
DQ Write 1,154
DQ Mixed 1,360
1,016% 1360 MB/s
Poor: 286% Great: 587%
SRT USB 8GB
2GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 32.9
Write 20.9
Mixed 17.7
28% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.6
110% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TZ/RJ/FX DDR5 6000 C30 2x16GB-$105
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
200% Outstanding
MC Read 119
MC Write 50.5
MC Mixed 63.2
221% 77.5 GB/s
SC Read 43.5
SC Write 51.6
SC Mixed 46.1
134% 47.1 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 145%
This bench: 200%
Great: 219%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical X670E GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E16) Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 290%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 295%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X670E GAMING PLUS WIFI (MS-7E16)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,503
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $259WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback