Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory123.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '24 at 17:33
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 200
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 796
70% 598 Pts
64-Core 1,834
114% 1,834 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
HP(103C 88D4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.70
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
130% Outstanding
Lighting 181
Reflection 173
Parallax 162
148% 172 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 137
Splatting 119
117% 147 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 130%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZFLV512HCJH-000MV 512GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXV75M0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 571 576 573 575 561 455 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 1,041
Write 574
Mixed 450
SusWrite 552
145% 654 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 73.8
4K Mixed 37.3
136% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 779
DQ Write 479
DQ Mixed 575
443% 611 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 145%
Great: 161%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
464GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 470 468 467 470 470 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 474
Mixed 407
SusWrite 470
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 70.6
4K Mixed 48.5
157% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 354
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 114%
Great: 134%
Samsung MZ7LN512HMJP-000H1 512GB
422GB free
Firmware: MAV01H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 475 474 473 475 475 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 478
Mixed 412
SusWrite 474
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 71.7
4K Mixed 48.5
158% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 354
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 114%
Great: 127%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA84GR7AFR4N-VK 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
138% Outstanding
MC Read 63.8
MC Write 55.1
MC Mixed 49.7
161% 56.2 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 19.4
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 138%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM0DF6 SAMSUNG
Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,318 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $419
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $259WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback