Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 45%
Desktop 77%
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star H310 Gaming Infinite (MS-B915)
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190508
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 14 '24 at 17:33
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 78.6
1-Core 113
2-Core 213
76% 135 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 468
57% 439 Pts
64-Core 624
39% 624 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 555.99
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58.5% Above average
Lighting 76.2
Reflection 75.3
Parallax 70.9
62% 74.1 fps
MRender 62.1
Gravity 70.6
Splatting 57.8
52% 63.5 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1032 256GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21111000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,054
Write 813
Mixed 831
200% 900 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 45.9
152% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 672
DQ Write 636
DQ Mixed 570
451% 626 MB/s
Poor: 105% Great: 187%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$22
422GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 115 110 100 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 140
Write 132
Mixed 84
SusWrite 106
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
68% Good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 21.3
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 20.8
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 86.9
46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 68%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 29: 0P 4R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
29% 27% 33 132 8 144 27" 1920 1057 ACR06E2 VG271
Typical H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08) Builds (Compare 3,934 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 76%
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 62%

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $312
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback