Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO AX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO AX  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210414
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '24 at 16:12
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 72.3
1-Core 156
2-Core 310
95% 180 Pts
4-Core 532
8-Core 914
88% 723 Pts
64-Core 1,163
72% 1,163 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Device(7377 1401) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 555.99
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
135% Outstanding
Lighting 194
Reflection 174
Parallax 169
158% 179 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 136
Splatting 119
116% 146 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 135%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda Q5 ZP500CV30001 500GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SU5SH017
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 972
Write 918
Mixed 879
206% 923 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 5.5
155% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 32.5
DQ Mixed 122
89% 121 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 205%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$22
139GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 192
Write 186
Mixed 129
126% 169 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.8
189% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$75
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 70.1
Write 128
Mixed 69.6
67% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
69.1% Good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 26.7
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 21.8
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 89.6
45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 144 23.8" 1920 1080 AUS24AF ASUS VP249
Typical GA-B550M AORUS PRO AX Builds (Compare 94 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 124%
Desktop 102%
Workstation 113%

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550M AORUS PRO AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $558
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback