Asrock Z87 Extreme4/TB4

Performance Results

Gaming 26%
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 23%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z87 Extreme4/TB4  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '24 at 16:11
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$110
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Memory 96.6
1-Core 117
2-Core 258
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 690
73% 583 Pts
64-Core 692
43% 692 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 36E2) 1GB
CLim: 1485 MHz, MLim: 1416 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Lighting 24.8
Reflection 20.5
Parallax 23.3
20% 22.9 fps
MRender 27.4
Gravity 26.5
Splatting 18.9
19% 24.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$33
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 328 39 223 36 36 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 370
Write 436
Mixed 337
SusWrite 187
75% 333 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 43.6
170% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 147
140% 212 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 89%
Great: 85%
Samsung 850 120GB
31GB free
Firmware: MVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 159 160 160 160 161 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 494
Mixed 424
SusWrite 194
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 65.7
232% 84.2 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 357
267% 355 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 120%
Great: 115%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
368GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 55 56 56 56 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 90.2
Write 84.2
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 56.1
54% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G3D1608DT1TX0. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
78% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 24.3
78% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 24.7
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 52.7
76% 52.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 78%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 17: 0P 2R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
17% 31% 16 218 59 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical Z87 Extreme4/TB4 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop 80%
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z87 Extreme4/TB4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $326
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $77
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback