Razer Blade 15 (2022) - RZ09-0421

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics20.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemRazer Blade 15 (2022) - RZ09-0421  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH580
Memory56.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '24 at 16:10
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Memory 73.3
1-Core 188
2-Core 366
108% 209 Pts
4-Core 612
8-Core 882
93% 747 Pts
64-Core 1,301
80% 1,301 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(1A58 201B) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Lighting 24.3
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 27.2
20% 27.2 fps
MRender 26.8
Gravity 31.7
Splatting 22.3
22% 26.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL21T0HCLR-00B00 1TB
725GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7701Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,474
Write 2,681
Mixed 1479
492% 2,211 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 73.3
274% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,453
DQ Write 1052
DQ Mixed 1,218
920% 1,241 MB/s
Poor: 192% Great: 444%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM CMSX64GX5M2A4800C40 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
149% Outstanding
MC Read 59.8
MC Write 58.8
MC Mixed 57.1
167% 58.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 45.2
SC Mixed 27.5
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 94.9
42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 113%
This bench: 149%
Great: 162%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 8: 0P 1R 0G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
8% 15% 27 215 57 240 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0A67
Typical Blade 15 (2022) - RZ09-0421 Builds (Compare 648 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Razer Blade 15 (2022) - RZ09-0421

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $77
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback