Performance Results

Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star GF65 Thin 9SEXR
MotherboardMSI MS-16W1  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200519
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateJun 14 '24 at 16:09
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 197
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 405
45% 352 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 12AA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.8% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 7.8
5% 7.53 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 0.2
5% 6.53 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.8%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$55
278GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 49 89 53 51 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 1,335
Write 908
Mixed 750
SusWrite 106
171% 775 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 30.7
4K Mixed 32.5
111% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 407
DQ Mixed 218
201% 305 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 110%
Great: 209%
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AI1 512GB
66GB free
Firmware: ECFK52.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 922 118 87 86 64 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 924
Write 926
Mixed 831
SusWrite 221
163% 726 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 53
175% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 645
DQ Mixed 396
323% 446 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 126%
Great: 203%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT8GA64D88CX3S-JR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.6% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 19.1
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 21.6
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUOAF90
Typical MS-16W1 Builds (Compare 4,808 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 57%
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 49%

Motherboard: MSI MS-16W1

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $77
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback