Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 180%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics168% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240322
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJun 14 '24 at 16:06
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 91.7
1-Core 176
2-Core 348
110% 205 Pts
4-Core 695
8-Core 1,217
115% 956 Pts
64-Core 1,539
95% 1,539 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 111%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7700-XT
Sapphire(1DA2 475F) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 24.5.1
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
168% Outstanding
Lighting 212
Reflection 257
Parallax 402
172% 290 fps
MRender 245
Gravity 243
Splatting 267
208% 252 fps
Poor: 106%
This bench: 168%
Great: 176%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$72
392GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1959 309 176 211 233 196 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1,635
Write 2,023
Mixed 1,676
SusWrite 514
329% 1,462 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 74.2
242% 82.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,377
DQ Write 1,036
DQ Mixed 1,165
882% 1,192 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 226%
Great: 295%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: M6CR061
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 220 30 23 25 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 490
Write 300
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 112
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 14.4
112% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 17.8
60% 128 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 99%
Micron CT2000X 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: PMAP
SusWrite @10s intervals: 744 764 764 764 763 763 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 50% Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 34
89% 31 GB/s
SC Read 31.1
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 36.1
86% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 48 60 32" 1280 720 MST0030 MStar Demo
Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,094 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $377
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback