Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZV4_FX507ZV4

Performance Results

Gaming 131%
Desktop 106%
Workstation 139%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZV4_FX507ZV4  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX507ZV4
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240229
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 13 '24 at 21:14
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 79.9
1-Core 189
2-Core 363
110% 211 Pts
4-Core 671
8-Core 1,152
110% 911 Pts
64-Core 1,940
120% 1,940 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 103%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 277D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3225 MHz, MLim: 4125 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 555.99
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Lighting 176
Reflection 157
Parallax 143
144% 159 fps
MRender 214
Gravity 119
Splatting 96
111% 143 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 126%
Great: 129%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA003 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1421 1467 1062 93 86 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1,427
Write 1,508
Mixed 1219
SusWrite 701
273% 1,214 MB/s
4K Read 60.7
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 38.1
232% 90.7 MB/s
DQ Read 919
DQ Write 506
DQ Mixed 872
606% 766 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 199%
Great: 234%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 42.4
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 37.7
115% 40.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 24.8
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 108%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 13 150 21.7" 1280 720 BOE0B70 NE156FHM-NX6
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZV4_FX507ZV4 Builds (Compare 504 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 112%
Desktop 101%
Workstation 117%

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZV4_FX507ZV4

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback