Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive318% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory16.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240322
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 13 '24 at 11:32
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 79.8
1-Core 171
2-Core 335
103% 195 Pts
4-Core 661
8-Core 1,284
115% 973 Pts
64-Core 1,526
94% 1,526 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 8809) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
19% Very poor
Lighting 24.1
Reflection 21.9
Parallax 32.8
20% 26.3 fps
MRender 15
Gravity 27.6
Splatting 21.8
18% 21.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
284GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2004 1911 1938 1924 1923 1864 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
318% Outstanding
Read 2494
Write 2,172
Mixed 1,073
SusWrite 1,928
429% 1,917 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 90.7
4K Mixed 59.2
194% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,100
DQ Write 708
DQ Mixed 955
698% 921 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 318%
Great: 393%
Lexar NM620 256GB
148GB free
Firmware: SN10660
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1653 1652 668 186 145 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1,849
Write 1,798
Mixed 897
SusWrite 741
295% 1,321 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 60.8
200% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,161
DQ Write 824
DQ Mixed 629
568% 871 MB/s
Poor: 121%
This bench: 226%
Great: 254%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C16D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
91.9% Outstanding
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 29.7
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 39.2
SC Mixed 29.9
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 84.6" 1280 720 SAM0FF9 SAMSUNG
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,638 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $718
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback