Lenovo 83AU

Performance Results

Gaming 22%
Desktop 65%
Workstation 22%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 83AU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4.4 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231228
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 13 '24 at 11:27
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Memory 51.6
1-Core 85.5
2-Core 168
56% 102 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 529
50% 412 Pts
64-Core 857
53% 857 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RadeonT 680M
Legend(17AA 381F) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver:
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.6% Poor
Lighting 39.6
Reflection 47.7
Parallax 40.7
32% 42.7 fps
MRender 18.5
Gravity 23.1
Splatting 24.7
18% 22.1 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 34%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS512GEJ4X112N 512GB
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51030C31
SusWrite @10s intervals: 853 859 803 729 243 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 1,152
Write 903
Mixed 1,040
SusWrite 598
207% 923 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 32.7
4K Mixed 20.9
82% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 392
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 377
244% 291 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 118%
Great: 319%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G32D4DR-031 WT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
75.9% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 28.4
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 17
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 90 14.5" 1421 888 LEN89BF
Typical 83AU Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 83AU

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback