Lenovo 83CV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 83CV  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory16.9 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240403
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 13 '24 at 11:27
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 22 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
65% Good
Memory 46.1
1-Core 165
2-Core 270
84% 161 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 609
68% 533 Pts
64-Core 868
54% 868 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 65%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc Graphics
Legend(17AA 3D5E) 128MB
Driver: igd9trinity64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5534
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 26.6
Parallax 45.3
14% 29.8 fps
MRender 28.1
Gravity 36.1
Splatting 42.5
30% 35.6 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZAL81T0HDLB-00BL2 1TB
861GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L1QKXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1298 886 841 1426 1510 1619 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 1,225
Write 1,163
Mixed 1082
SusWrite 1,263
267% 1,183 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 41.7
4K Mixed 18.1
89% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 417
274% 328 MB/s
Poor: 187%
This bench: 165%
Great: 409%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F2G32D4DS-026 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 7467 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
148% Outstanding
MC Read 47.9
MC Write 53.2
MC Mixed 75.7
168% 58.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 38.2
SC Mixed 28.3
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 196
20% 196 ns
Poor: 127%
This bench: 148%
Great: 171%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 34 9 60 14" 1536 960 LEN88AC
Typical 83CV Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 83CV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback