HP EliteBook 8770w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteBook 8770w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176C
Memory14.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131008
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 13 '24 at 11:26
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3720QM-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 74.9
1-Core 89.1
2-Core 169
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 441
47% 376 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7700M
HP(103C 176C) 1GB
Driver: 22.6.1
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
8.01% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 15.4
8% 13.7 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 10.8
9% 11.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.01%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ZD256 256GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2227I
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 393 379 343 176 178 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 454
Write 369
Mixed 356
SusWrite 307
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 12.9
89% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 16.6
72% 157 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.2% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 12.4
SC Mixed 11.1
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 97
41% 97 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 11 60 21.7" 1280 720 LGD03FB
Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 570 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback