Asrock B450M Pro4-F

Performance Results

Gaming 58%
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 51%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics69.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4-F  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '24 at 11:25
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 75.1
1-Core 128
2-Core 246
82% 150 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 636
65% 525 Pts
64-Core 658
41% 658 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Nvidia(10DE 21C4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3533 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 552.44
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.9% Good
Lighting 86.7
Reflection 124
Parallax 80.1
71% 96.9 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 79
Splatting 71.2
68% 85.7 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot P210 256GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1128B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 189 5.1 8.1 47 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 501
Write 256
Mixed 334
SusWrite 71.2
64% 291 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 0.3
54% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 48.3
DQ Write 12.1
DQ Mixed 0.4
8% 20.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$22
298GB free
Firmware: 13057113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 142 138 141 142 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 157
Write 126
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 141
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$33
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 31.8
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 29.4
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 23.5" 1280 720 MSI3BA0 MSI G24C4
Typical B450M Pro4-F Builds (Compare 1,960 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 65%
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 61%

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $317
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback