Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics66.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA550
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200604
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 11 '24 at 19:29
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 84.9
1-Core 78.6
2-Core 157
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 490
48% 392 Pts
64-Core 621
38% 621 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
Device(1A58 2011) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 32.0.15.5599
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.7% Good
Lighting 82.2
Reflection 87.6
Parallax 81.9
67% 83.9 fps
MRender 97.3
Gravity 73.7
Splatting 74.4
66% 81.8 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 83%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GB
381GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1531 1003 797 797 795 796 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 995
Write 1,162
Mixed 1,123
SusWrite 953
239% 1,058 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 71
4K Mixed 54.2
175% 56.7 MB/s
DQ Read 642
DQ Write 454
DQ Mixed 554
412% 550 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 177%
Great: 297%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
66.1% Good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 20.2
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 19.3
56% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 144 15.5" 1536 864 NCP004B
Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328 Builds (Compare 2,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback