Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics86.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory52.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '24 at 17:58
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9820X-$550
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 74.1
1-Core 106
2-Core 210
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 720
63% 535 Pts
64-Core 1,524
94% 1,524 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$234
EVGA(3842 2061) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.9% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 85.4
Parallax 106
90% 101 fps
MRender 125
Gravity 95
Splatting 84
81% 101 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$171
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1331 1333 1396 1407 1387 1395 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 1,642
Write 1,519
Mixed 1,521
SusWrite 1,375
341% 1,514 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 60
203% 69.8 MB/s
DQ Read 785
DQ Write 652
DQ Mixed 695
527% 711 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 245%
Great: 508%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$200
1TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1391 1335 1282 1290 1390 1348 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 1,514
Write 1,433
Mixed 1,108
SusWrite 1,339
303% 1,348 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 91.5
4K Mixed 43.8
153% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 870
DQ Write 608
DQ Mixed 759
561% 746 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 222%
Great: 371%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
560GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 288 297 295 294 295 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 426
Write 405
Mixed 371
SusWrite 292
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 70.7
4K Mixed 36.3
123% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 352
266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
155GB free
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 370 365 339 324 312 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 426
Write 406
Mixed 350
SusWrite 348
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 62.6
4K Mixed 42.8
112% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 319
250% 346 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 133%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
212GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 198 198 185 186 197 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
142% Outstanding
Read 300
Write 244
Mixed 66
SusWrite 193
145% 201 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 2.1
612% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 142%
Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$140
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 162 161 162 163 159 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 138
Write 150
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 161
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.7
228% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 86%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
MC Read 34
MC Write 52.9
MC Mixed 33.6
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 11
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 92.6
43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 51 165 31.5" 1280 720 HPN3762 HP X32
Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,696 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $788
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $198Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $77
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback