Gigabyte GA-H61M-D2H-USB3

Performance Results

Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61M-D2H-USB3  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120713
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 11 '24 at 16:06
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$201
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 88.8
2-Core 159
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 437
45% 364 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 1019 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.14
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
3.11% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 3.4
3% 3.87 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.11%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD220 240GB-$33
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM71.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 248
Write 158
Mixed 187
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 50.4
4K Mixed 21.8
82% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 145
122% 179 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 93%
Sandisk SD9SB8W256G1002 256GB
104GB free
Firmware: X6103002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 191 193 200 203 198 MB/s
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.5% Good
Read 230
Write 207
Mixed 162
SusWrite 199
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 55.6
4K Mixed 30.4
107% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 187
145% 197 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.6% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 15.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 32" 1280 720 VES3700 32W_LCD_TV
Typical GA-H61M-D2H-USB3 Builds (Compare 252 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop 60%
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-D2H-USB3 - $115

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback