MSI MS-1581

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 months ago, 10 days ago.
SystemMicro-Star Katana GF66 11UE
MotherboardMSI MS-1581  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230706
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 11 '24 at 14:22
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 63.4
1-Core 141
2-Core 265
83% 156 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 714
73% 590 Pts
64-Core 907
56% 907 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 12EA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
5.58% Terrible
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 10.4
7% 11.3 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 1.3
3% 4.77 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.58%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3512B-AI1 512GB
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 887 342 302 270 82 187 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 1334
Write 1,043
Mixed 941
SusWrite 345
204% 916 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 48.2
182% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 306
DQ Write 446
DQ Mixed 324
260% 359 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 147%
Great: 213%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
60.6% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 17
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 14.3
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUO80ED
Typical MS-1581 Builds (Compare 4,990 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-1581

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback