Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
12 days ago, 11 days ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '24 at 14:21
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$119
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Memory 81.8
1-Core 162
2-Core 306
99% 183 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 964
95% 778 Pts
64-Core 1,140
71% 1,140 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$283
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3850 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 555.99
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 124
Parallax 129
113% 131 fps
MRender 146
Gravity 105
Splatting 92
91% 114 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 233010WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,503
Write 1,657
Mixed 1,325
334% 1,495 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 75.4
273% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,005
DQ Write 905
DQ Mixed 944
711% 951 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 237%
Spcc Solid State Disk 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: W0220A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 456 458 461 461 462 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
OLOy CL16-20-20 D4-3200 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 40.5
MC Write 36.9
MC Mixed 35.6
108% 37.7 GB/s
SC Read 28.2
SC Write 44.5
SC Mixed 31.9
100% 34.9 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 105%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV SSCR2
Typical TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II Builds (Compare 1,552 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $395
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback