Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 80% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 81% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	92.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171207
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 14 '18 at 10:05
Run Duration	191 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Memory 81.2 1-Core 116 2-Core 210 77% 136 Pts	4-Core 430 8-Core 859 76% 644 Pts	64-Core 1184 73% 1184 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2127 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	92.1% Outstanding	Lighting 116 Reflection 120 Parallax 104 94% 113 fps	MRender 105 Gravity 108 Splatting 109 88% 107 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 437GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	216% Outstanding	Read 2,084 Write 1,407 Mixed 1,252 349% 1,581 MB/s	4K Read 48.1 4K Write 84.9 4K Mixed 21.4 145% 51.5 MB/s	DQ Read 41.1 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 20.4 41% 77.8 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 216% Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 239GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4325 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2624 (B1) Unknown 99 99 31 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 53 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 258 (F1) Unknown 99 99 17037886587	108% Outstanding	Read 528 Write 502 Mixed 515 115% 515 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 88.4 4K Mixed 38.5 145% 52.9 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 270 DQ Mixed 21.1 84% 186 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 124%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 236GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 10590 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 7208 (B1) Unknown 96 96 117 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 77 47 23 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 253 253 48 (EB) Unknown 99 99 974 (F1) Unknown 99 99 21833262288	71.2% Very good	Read 507 Write 391 Mixed 436 99% 444 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 63.3 4K Mixed 13.7 84% 32.8 MB/s	DQ Read 22.3 DQ Write 98.7 DQ Mixed 13.5 24% 44.8 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 86%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 232GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5458 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4569 (B1) Unknown 99 99 8 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 47 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 713 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3777244849	76.3% Very good	Read 507 Write 347 Mixed 354 89% 403 MB/s	4K Read 37.2 4K Write 65.3 4K Mixed 17.2 113% 39.9 MB/s	DQ Read 36.9 DQ Write 59.8 DQ Mixed 17.1 22% 37.9 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 118%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 223GB free Firmware: Z22000RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 47 100 47 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1240 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 21 (A9) Unknown 100 100 24 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 16 (AE) Unknown 100 100 36 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 70 100 188978561054 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 2704 (F1) Unknown 253 253 2102 (F2) Unknown 253 253 2160	74.7% Very good	Read 508 Write 370 Mixed 420 96% 432 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 75.8 4K Mixed 4.24 81% 34.5 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 255 DQ Mixed 3.92 62% 145 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3400 C16 2x8GB 1,517 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	MC Read 41.1 MC Write 37.5 MC Mixed 35.4 108% 38 GB/s	SC Read 25.7 SC Write 39.6 SC Mixed 31.4 92% 32.2 GB/s	Latency 78.4 51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,063

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)