Asus X99-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	82.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus X99-PRO (all builds)
Memory	24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140923
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 14 '18 at 07:56
Run Duration	319 Seconds
Run User	KWT-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 87.7 1-Core 87.6 2-Core 175 69% 117 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 488 50% 404 Pts	64-Core 662 41% 662 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 376A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.59 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	111% Outstanding	Lighting 136 Reflection 192 Parallax 185 111% 171 fps	MRender 134 Gravity 180 Splatting 131 120% 148 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 267GB free Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8995 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1128 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 41 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 141 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2186386561	81.3% Excellent	Read 492 Write 166 Mixed 284 69% 314 MB/s	4K Read 41.5 4K Write 64.3 4K Mixed 27.6 132% 44.5 MB/s	DQ Read 339 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 95.2 119% 214 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 81.3% Great: 126%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 14514 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2408 (B1) Unknown 86 86 165 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 42 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 9 (EB) Unknown 99 99 287 (F1) Unknown 99 99 37730305616	82.9% Excellent	Read 473 Write 274 Mixed 300 77% 349 MB/s	4K Read 39.7 4K Write 61.4 4K Mixed 22.6 122% 41.2 MB/s	DQ Read 323 DQ Write 199 DQ Mixed 66.4 102% 196 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 123369312 (03) Spinup time 92 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2334 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 60 33586433 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 10564 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1028 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 71 67 504823837 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 46 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 216186 (C2) HDA temperature 29 40 73014444061 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -96915937026540 (F1) Unknown 100 253 17687993549 (F2) Unknown 100 253 209234520898	85.9% Excellent	Read 155 Write 145 Mixed 145 112% 148 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.38 4K Mixed 0.16 66% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 113%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$65 16,938 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 58GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 63 (03) Spinup time 193 171 1316 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1986 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 13050 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1799 (BF) G-sense error rate 1 1 3205 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 166 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 128 128 218263 (C2) HDA temperature 119 93 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (F0) Head flying hours 85 85 11407 (F1) Unknown 200 200 18655608985 (F2) Unknown 200 200 25327942148 (FE) Unknown 199 199 1	46.9% Average	Read 77 Write 86.1 Mixed 86.4 63% 83.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 2.16 4K Mixed 0.21 76% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 71%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 64GB 654 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 39GB free, PID 007a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	5.32% Terrible	Read 18.3 Write 4.53 Mixed 7.7 11% 10.2 MB/s	4K Read 7.02 4K Write 0.006 4K Mixed 0.002 26% 2.34 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.32% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 8x4GB 556 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM 2133 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	97.7% Outstanding	MC Read 38.2 MC Write 35.1 MC Mixed 40.8 109% 38 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 15.8 SC Mixed 19.5 47% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 98% ↑ This bench: 97.7% Great: 131%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-PRO Builds (Compare 370 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 66%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 59%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO - $320

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	224x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	86x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	25x

GPU
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	39x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	38x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	26x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	18x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GBKingstonBench 90%, 4,583 samples	13x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $154Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	10x
BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FA 4x8GBCrucialBench 107%, 871 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $1,119

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16